Generative media
AI Studio
A creative team should be choosing between ideas, not between API providers.
The problem
Generative media is now dozens of vendors, each with its own SDK, its own pricing page and its own idea of what a good prompt looks like. Keeping up with which model is currently best at a given job is a full-time research task, and getting it wrong is expensive rather than merely annoying.
The gap between the cheapest competent image model and the famous one can be an order of magnitude, for output a client cannot tell apart.
What we built
One interface, hundreds of models
Image, video, audio and lipsync generation sit behind a single UI. Switching the model underneath a workflow does not change how the workflow is used.
The text lane is free
Turning a client brief into usable prompts, and enhancing those prompts, runs on a free text tier. You only pay when pixels are actually produced.
Routed on cost, verified in practice
Provider choice is a measured decision, not a brand preference. The routing exists because the cheap path was tested and found to be roughly ten times less expensive for equivalent output.
Built for client work
Briefs, generations and revisions stay organised per project, so the asset a client approved three weeks ago is still findable.
How it works
- A client brief goes in and is turned into a set of production-ready prompts.
- You pick the lane — image, video, audio, lipsync — and refine the prompt in place.
- Generation is routed to the provider that does that job best for the money.
- Output is kept with the brief that produced it.
At a glance
Want something like this?
We build production software for other people too — this is just what we build for ourselves.
Book a call